Latest updates

18/12/22

A final draft text released – we wait to see whether it will be accepted or opened up for further negotiation – the next 12 – 24 hours remain critical. No matter the outcome, our opportunities now lie at home. It will soon be up to us!

• While the biodiversity targets give direction, critical measures and timelines to address species extinction with the urgency required remain a limiting factor.
• There are levers that will enable productive, business and finance sectors to implement transitional change – but is it enough to deliver transformational change?
• Our ultimate ambition to halt biodiversity loss, implement suitable finance and recognise rights of indigenous people and local communities may determine whether the draft is finalised.

16/12/22

Snapshot from Montreal

Minister Plibersek has arrived to begin high level negotiations. Also good to see Senators Pocock and Hansen-Young on ground at the conference. We briefed each on our key priorities and shared observations of negotiations. A few hard working days left for negotiators.

With high level negotiations underway, we hope the final Global Biodiversity Framework will:

• drive transformational change across all of society to value nature, and recognise and respect the rights and contributions of Indigenous Peoples and Local Communities
• ensure we halt and reverse nature loss by 2030, including by protecting a representative 30% of terrestrial, inland water and coastal and marine ecosystems; and addressing the critical drivers of nature loss
• deliver and promote effective finance mechanisms that increase funding towards nature and decrease funding towards harmful activities; and mobilise resources to the global south.

15/12/22

Snapshot from Montreal

The Ministers arrive tomorrow for the high level segment. Tensions mount as many elements still unresolved – critical on their agenda will be resource mobilisation, digitised genetic information and implementation – hopefully their brief will also include ambition! 

• tensions have risen in the last 24 hours – developing nations walked out of some negotiations, calling for resource mobilisation to support effective implementation
• Target 3 – 30 x 30 – is still struggling to get agreement. Recognition of the role of Indigenous People and Local Communities, the varying definitions of protection and the ultimate number 30 remain sticking points!
• A few more words agreed and brackets removed… some concern about watered down targets just to get things over the line.

14/12/22

Snapshot from Montreal

Companies are increasingly realising that their dependencies on and impacts to nature matter. While strong signals point towards mandatory reporting in the future, whether required or not, businesses are already moving to understand what it means for them.

• Unprecedented business interest in nature! Hundreds of businesses are on the ground, many of whom say this is their first Biodiversity COP
• 150 financial institutions signed a statement that called for coordinated action by governments to tackle climate change and halt and reverse biodiversity loss
• The mandatory reporting target (#15) saw business sector interventions resulting in observer applause…not everyone was pleased… time will tell where this target lands

13/12/22

Our CEO, Dr Jody Gunn, is on the ground in Montreal. Here are some of her reflections from the last few days.

• “Waiting for their parents to arrive” has been a phrase I’ve heard a few times over the last 24 hours. “Infuriating”, “slow” and “gruelling” are other words that have been referenced as hour after hour of contact meetings take place. Government officials – including our own – deliberating over every word; staying over lunch breaks to resolve the next set of challenging text; contact meetings breaking down into smaller huddles, hoping to crack a nut or resolve a tricky issue, only to come back to put on the table something that gets deliberated all over again. Feeling a breakthrough in some text, only for it to be brought to a halt by a later intervention… such have been the last few days, some might say the last few years.
• As an “observer”, as my COP15 pass reminds me, this is, after a few years, challenging to watch in real life; as an official government delegate with an ambition, a hope, a desire, or a risk to mitigate, this must be high pressure. And, with the Ministers arriving in just a few days, the pressure is even higher to ensure you’ve delivered as best you can for your country, its people, and the environment on which we all rely.
• What appears to be resoundingly agreed is that nature and people must thrive. Ms Elizabeth Mrema asserted at the Nature and Culture Forum, some of the agreements made to date should ensure that the joint program of work adopted for the next 10 years will ensure that both nature and culture are reflected in the implementation of the 2020 framework. But these are just some of the framework elements and more, including language in targets and resource mobilisation must be achieved if this is to be realised.
• But as another day passes and another set of text gets re-worked, concerns are mounting that the task presented to the arriving ministers is not as clean as it should be – and has the potential to result in more trade-offs and ultimately the potential for a weaker framework.
• Goal A, the critical goal that should set a high ambition for integrity connectivity and resilience of all ecosystems including for their protection, management and restoration, hangs in the balance. When I left the contact group this afternoon, we had at least ensured that our ultimate goal was not only going to focus on vulnerable and threatened ecosystems but the full suite of ecosystems; however, like with a number of other goals, the mid-term milestones (by 2030 specific measurable objectives) that will help us measure our progress towards 2050 were becoming harder and harder to hold onto in the text.  Without measurable milestones it will be difficult to know if we are on track and drive us towards the rapid change we need.
• Regarding the targets, 5 through to 14 are still in various states of agreement, target 3 will no doubt remain a trade-off play and pesticides, pollution and percentages remain hard to pin down.
• The Chairs of the contact groups and targeted discussion leads have been working tirelessly to build consensus – being strict on intervention to bring in new text and moving through brackets with a required balance of humour and callous intent.
• With the vastly different needs articulated from the more than 190 state parties, I do not envy the facilitators – however to get to where we need to be – compromise needs to be made, ambition put forward over detail; and resources must be brought forward to support those who will be most impacted by and responsible for its implementation.
• We’re not there yet – but with the right mix of commitment and high level ambition, it is still possible to get over the line.
• It must get over the line – the people on the ground and the nature they are protecting depend upon it .

12/12/22

Snapshot from Montreal

With a rest day for working groups on Sunday – the conference opened up to a range of inspiring forums

• By Saturday 10th December, 1/3 of all resolutions to the conference had been reviewed and approved
• While some important outcomes, including those related to Indigenous People and Local Communities and other framework elements, much of the detail in the Goals and Targets remain unresolved to this point
• After a rest for working groups on Sunday – it is expected the negotiations will (and must) ramp up this week as Ministers arrive

7/12/22

The COP15 Opening Ceremony has just concluded, with all speakers recognising our reliance upon nature and our shared responsibility to protect it.

Open-ended Working Group 5 wraps up as we head to COP15

• Three days of meetings and negotiations have concluded but without sufficient progress on some of the most important elements of the framework, with effectively 2 versions of the document remaining on the table.
• Considerable progress was made to integrate a rights-based approach into the framework. This is of particular relevance to Indigenous communities and local people, and with respect to gender-based approaches.
• The intent of the Goals remains under discussion. It is possible we could end up with aspirational goals only – we must continue to push towards including measurable outcomes so parties know where they stand by 2030.
• On sustainable use, slow progress was made. We need to see strong ambition and ambitious targets for just transitions of industry.
• Some critical issues did not receive adequate time for discussion. For example, the 30×30 aspiration and the ambition on restoration were not discussed. Nor were implementation mechanisms. These will enable parties to take stock during implementation and must be given the time needed to agree.
• There was no agreement on how to change the course of business from harming nature to investing in nature and the finance issues were not agreed and could limit the ability to ultimately agree on a framework.

What does all this mean? As we move from the opening ceremony to the main stage for negotiations, governments from around the world must keep their eyes on the ultimate mission – to set a north star of halting and reversing nature loss for a nature positive world, and ensuring an ambitious and measurable framework that addresses the scale and urgency of the biodiversity loss we are facing.